Category: Digital Media (Page 6 of 16)

Streaming costs Netflix 10 times less than mailing a DVD

Netflix StreamingNetflix streaming is just about the greatest thing around (yeah, it’s better than Hulu) for video content. The interface is clean, easy to use, and the selection is good enough for my $10 a month. Streaming has also saved Netflix a whole lot of money.

To stream a movie in HD costs Netflix around 5 cents, 3 cents for standard def. That’s it. Now granted, that doesn’t account for licensing and all that, but it sure as hell beats the pants off sending things through the mail. That cost could even go down as more competitors enter the back-end market responsible for supporting the Netflix streaming system.

My question – why aren’t more things available for streaming? If it’s so cheap, that extra revenue could be kicked back in part to studios for freeing up more streaming content. Everyone wins.

Source: Business Week

Netflix looks to buy exclusive online rights to Paramount, Lionsgate and MGM catalogs

Netflix streaming.According to the LA Times, Netflix is looking to add more titles to its streaming options by adding exclusive access to Paramount, Lionsgate, and MGM film catalogs. The deal, which would manifest as a partnership with EPIX, would cost Netflix something like a billion dollars for five years of exclusivity.

Any time Netflix says it will expand its streaming catalog, I’m a happy man. I do most of my movie viewing via streaming on my desktop, often while I’m doing work throughout the day. More options is always a good thing. Unfortunately, this deal would still suffer, as the current streaming system does, from Hollywood mandated “windowing,” pushing streamable titles beyond the rent date. Hopefully studios will start to get more flexible as streaming becomes more and more popular.

Bill Gates sees the internet as the future of education

Bill Gates.Bill Gates has had a lot to say at the Techonomy conference in Lake Tahoe this weekend, and this is just one among many interesting things he offered up. Gates thinks the future of higher education will be less place-based, at least for students with a little initiative.

“Five years from now on the web for free you’ll be able to find the best lectures in the world,” Gates said. “It will be better than any single university.” To some extent you can already see this happening. iTunes U already offers up some of the best lectures in the world for free. As education continues to embrace technology we’re sure to see more and more examples of the best educators providing free content for the rest of the world.

I don’t agree, though, that education should be less place-based. There’s a lot to be said for the experience of getting away from home, away from family, away from comfort, and immersing yourself in your education. It doesn’t work for everyone, and certainly a lot of the current college system could use an overhaul, but to eliminate the concept of place from the educational experience seems like a mistake.

Lots of reviews coming this week

konnet_icradoThings have been a little slow over here as I’ve been working on a few other projects and dealing with some big announcement over on Fearless Gamer, our gaming blog. This week we’ll be back in full swing though, and I’m adding a bunch of reviews to the site.

Later in the week you’ll start to see some of the new iPhone 4 accessories. Over the rest of the summer I’ll be getting a few more, but for now I’ve got at least a dock to show off. I’ll also be covering the Booq line of laptop bags (more specifically the Boa S Nerve) and Warpia’s wireless PC-to-TV broadcast system.

I’ve also been starting to dig around Aperture. I had played with the software a bit when it first launched, but without any high quality images, it wasn’t a piece of software I cared to invest in. Now that I have my shiny new camera, I think it’s time I take a more serious look. I’ll be posting my impressions throughout the week as I get to know the ins and outs of photo management (from what I hear, Aperture is the way it should be done).

Vuzix Wrap 310: Great concept, poor execution

vuzix_wrap_310

For as far as we’ve come in technological advances over the years, one thing that still hasn’t been perfected is video eyewear. I’m not exactly sure why anyone would want to have to wear something over their eyes in order to watch a movie when we have things like iPhones, iPads and portable DVD players, but Vuzix – one of the companies at the forefront of video eyewear – clearly believes it’s the future of on-the-go entertainment. But while it’s a great idea in concept, it’s hard to get over just how goofy you look wearing them. Though the latest line from Vuzix isn’t quite Virtual Boy-big – they look more like a pair of sunglasses that you’d buy at the gas station – they’re still a little clunky for something best used during travel.

Vuzix currently has three different models out on the market – the Wrap 230, 310 and 920 – and although the latter version features the biggest screen and best resolution of the bunch, it’s not worth the higher price tag. The Wrap 310 will work just fine for most users, as it offers a home theater experience akin to watching a 55-inch TV from about 10 feet away. The glasses themselves are actually pretty comfortable, but after you’ve plugged in a pair of headphones, the remote control unit, and your iPhone, it suddenly becomes very awkward to carry around. Still, Vuzix has made them as user-friendly as possible. It takes only a few minutes to set up, and the nosepiece is easily adjustable so that the unit can be shared between people of all sizes.

Where the Wrap 310 really falters, however, is in image quality. Though it supposedly boasts two “high-resolution” 428×480 LCD widescreen displays, it has a screen door effect that severely lowers the overall quality – especially when compared to watching a movie on your iPhone or PC. Unfortunately, that makes its appeal even lower, since a majority of the product’s target audience will probably be tech heads who are obsessed with image quality. That’s not to say that you can’t enjoy watching a movie on the Wrap 310 – the picture is decent enough, and you can personalize video settings like brightness, contrast and color saturation via an onscreen menu – but it doesn’t look as good as it probably should.

Playing video games while wearing the glasses is a little surreal, but it can be a bit dizzying (much like virtual reality), and ultimately isn’t worth it considering most people have big screen HDTVs in their homes these days. Sunlight also creeps through unless you’re in complete darkness, and though Vuzix sells a bulky rubber lightshield for $15, it’s something that really should have been included in the package. Of course, when you take into account that one of the main selling points of the Wrap 310 is its stylish, compact design, I can understand why they wouldn’t want to.

There are a few positives to the Wrap 310 – like offering enough room to wear glasses underneath or providing the option to manually adjust the focus for prescription-free viewing – but it’s simply not enough to warrant the suggested $249.99 price tag. Though you can find them for much cheaper on Amazon, it’s an amenity that most people just don’t need. I loved being able to lay around while watching a movie, and it would be great to have a little extra privacy on a plane trip, but until Vuzix can offer a comparable moviegoing experience, it’s probably best to wait.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Gadget Teaser

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑