The magazine industry has finally announced what people have speculated for months now: several publishers will collaborate to introduce a digital format for existing print magazines. The project includes Time Warner, Hearst, Meredith, Condé Nast, and News Corp. and will exist as its own entity, replete with a full corporate infrastructure, including a new CEO.

The most glaring problem with this plan is distribution. The unnamed venture hopes to control publishing, something neither Amazon or Apple can possibly like. This new venture has to keep both those companies in mind as it’s their devices this media will release to.

And then there’s the issue of value. Are people really going to pay for this kind of content? I’d say it’s doubtful at best, and the odds go down if it can’t be tied into an existing Amazon or iTunes account. I’d say the target for this sort of project already has their online subscriptions to sites that offer high value per dollar. Can the same be said for a digital version of Condé Nast Travel? I don’t think so.

Source: All Things D

If you haven’t heard, Time Warner is changing their pricing structure for Internet usage. The news has been out there for a few months but the change has yet to be implemented. At a high level, Time Warner will be using a tiered pricing structure for all internet service. Use more bandwidth, pay more for it. Use less, pay less. As you might imagine, this has many people up in arms and is even causing protests.

The same article has a good description of the pricing structure:

Under the new system, customers would choose Internet usage plans that cap uploads and downloads at 10, 20, 40, and 60 gigabytes. Customers would pay $1 per GB in overage fees if they go over their caps. The pricing is similar to how consumers pay for cell phone service.

The announcement was met with outrage from customers and threats of legislation to block the change. In reaction, Time Warner postponed its tests in Austin and San Antonio, big areas for tech business.

For the Triad and Rochester, the company announced two additional tiers, including a “budget” tier allowing 1 GB of data use per month for just $15 and a “super-tier” allowing up to 100 GB of data use for $75. The company also said it would limit overage fees to no more than $75, essentially creating an “unlimited” plan for those willing to pay the fees.

You would think I would be furious about these changes, right? Well, I’m not. And I’ll tell you why. I think everything should be pay as you go. Everything. Why am I paying over $100 for cell phone service if I only use about $50 worth? Why do I pay for channels on TV that I never, ever watch? Why do I pay the same price for a ticket on an airline as they guy who weighs twice as much as I do or the guy who checks two 49 pound bags and carries on 2 more? The airline prices are all based on fuel consumption and fuel consumption is directly related to weight. We should be paying per pound on the airlines like we do with UPS and FedEx. We pay as you go for electric, gas, water, gasoline, and more. So why not pay as you go for internet as well?

My only problem with the Time Warner idea is that the prices seem too high.