	
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>warner music group &#8211; Gadget Teaser</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/warner-music-group/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com</link>
	<description>Tracking the gadget and tech revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 04:40:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Warner cuts free music stream support</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/02/13/warner-cuts-free-music-stream-support/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 04:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free music streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[last.fm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[songza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spotify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warner music group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wmg]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=2737</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Warner&#8217;s been making a lot of noise with regard to digital media over the past several weeks. First, we had CEO Bronfman complaining about the flexibility offered to ebook publishers. Now he&#8217;s decided that the free streaming method of content delivery isn&#8217;t working for his label anymore. Free streaming services are clearly not net positive [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/02/13/warner-cuts-free-music-stream-support/">Warner cuts free music stream support</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://phandroid.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/lastfmlogo.png" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" class="photo_right_noborder" width="250" height="134" src="http://phandroid.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/lastfmlogo.png" alt="Last.fm logo." /></a>Warner&#8217;s been making a lot of noise with regard to digital media over the past several weeks. First, we had CEO Bronfman complaining about the flexibility offered to <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/ebooks">ebook</a> publishers. Now he&#8217;s decided that the free streaming method of content delivery isn&#8217;t working for his label anymore. </p>
<blockquote><p>Free streaming services are clearly not net positive for the industry and as far as Warner Music is concerned will not be licensed. The &#8216;get all your music you want for free, and then maybe with a few bells and whistles we can move you to a premium price&#8217; strategy is not the kind of approach to business that we will be supporting in the future.</p></blockquote>
<p>Though he&#8217;s clearly unhappy with the status quo, he didn&#8217;t really define whether he would be pulling existing licenses or simply refraining from signing new ones. It&#8217;s also not that he doesn&#8217;t like <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/streaming">streaming</a> &#8211; it&#8217;s the free part he&#8217;s concerned with. As long as the music is paid for by the listener, Bronfman can rest a happy man. </p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8507885.stm" target="_blank">BBC</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/02/13/warner-cuts-free-music-stream-support/">Warner cuts free music stream support</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital music price flexibility resulted in slower sales</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/02/10/digital-music-price-flexibility-resulted-in-slower-sales/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hachette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harpercollins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macmillan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warner music group]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=2718</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Warner Music Group delivered some interesting news in the wake of the Macmillan/Amazon standoff. When Warner was finally given pricing flexibility for its iTunes content last April it kicked off a slow decline in sales growth. As Warner put things, year to year “digital track equivalent album unit growth” was down from 10 percent in [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/02/10/digital-music-price-flexibility-resulted-in-slower-sales/">Digital music price flexibility resulted in slower sales</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pmpworldwide.com/_media/ax_content/itunes_money.png" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" class="photo_right_noborder" width="250" height="198" src="http://www.pmpworldwide.com/_media/ax_content/itunes_money.png" alt="iTunes sales slow with price flexibility." /></a>Warner Music Group delivered some interesting news in the wake of the Macmillan/Amazon standoff. When Warner was finally given pricing flexibility for its <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/itunes">iTunes</a> content last April it kicked off a slow decline in sales growth. </p>
<p>As Warner put things, year to year “digital track equivalent album unit growth” was down from 10 percent in the September quarter to just 5 percent for the December quarter. We can still blame the recession in part, but the decline didn&#8217;t begin until prices went up. As Peter Kafka at AllThingsD notes, the digital music business is much more mature than the ebook industry. Also, despite the decline in sales growth, Warner CEO Edgar Bronfman Jr. said the change has been a net positive for his company. </p>
<p>Despite the warnings for publishers in this news, I still think the <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/ebooks">ebook</a> industry is young enough to pull of the price increase without much negative impact. </p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20100209/book-publishers-beware-at-itunes-expensive-music-equals-slower-sales/" target="_blank">AllThingsD</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/02/10/digital-music-price-flexibility-resulted-in-slower-sales/">Digital music price flexibility resulted in slower sales</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.gadgetteaser.com @ 2026-04-19 08:12:21 by W3 Total Cache
-->