Tag: twitter (Page 4 of 4)

T-Mobile Sidekick Gets Facebook And Twitter

Twitter on the Sidekick. T-Mobile’s Sidekick got the smartphone treatment today with the addition of Facebook and Twitter applications to the Sidekick Download Catalog. As one of the most prominent phones to implement a full keyboard and some proprietary messaging features, it’s really been a long time coming. The applications work with the Sidekick 2008, the Sidekick LX, and the Sidekick Slide.

The Facebook application is free but the Twitter app will run you $2 a month. I gotta say, $24 a year for Twitter use seems a little out of hand. It’s also strange considering the Sidekick 2009 comes pre-packaged with free apps for both Facebook and Twitter. Was Twitter really that much harder to integrate into the old phones than Facebook? Did they just not have as much developer support? Is the app just that cool?

If you have an older Sidekick and the time to drop a comment, let us know. This is a strange one.

Airlines Miss The Message In Our Complaints No Matter How We Voice Them

Angry Tweets.A recent story on Reuters claims airlines may be struggling against a new foe in their never-ending PR war: Twitter. Where people were once making phone calls and composing strongly worded letters from the cramped discomfort of a landed airline seat, they’re now blowing off unmitigated steam on social sites like Twitter.

I opened the story because I thought it might have a nice spin on making Twitter useful. I know the service has its uses, but I find them to be few and far between for the average user. As it turns out, it’s not Twitter that seems to be doing the talking to the airlines, it’s things like Dave Carroll’s YouTube song, United Breaks Guitars. The song, which Carroll wrote after United broke a guitar and failed to take responsibility, went viral, and urged a quick response from the airline. United donated some money in Carroll’s name to a music foundation.

So Carroll makes music, United breaks Carroll’s instrument of choice, Carroll can’t make music without his instrument of choice, United donates money to help more people get better at making music – is this really the course of action we’re after? Seems to me United is trying to say, “Oh we didn’t break that guitar because we hate music. We love music. We want more people to make music.” But making music was never the issue. The issue was how some United worker mishandled Carroll’s luggage. So why is United donating to a music foundation? Why not employee dexterity training? What about emotional intelligence courses to increase worker empathy? Hell, why not just pay your handlers more for not breaking your customer’s belongings? I would take anything, anything but a donation to a god damn music foundation.

What we need to realize as a collective customer base is that United is more like the detached, loaded father who still thinks we were one big mistake than a company that knows its business. See, Dad knows what bitching sounds like, and when it happens he throws a pile of money at it. Bitch some more, get a car. Bitch some more, get a new watch. Bitch some more, get a credit card. What dad doesn’t understand are the words coming out of our mouths. He doesn’t know, or more appropriately, doesn’t care to know the real problem, so he addresses it however he sees fit, which is usually some non sequitur of epic proportions.

I realize I got a little off track there, but all of this is to say that none of our complaints, whether they’re through Twitter or on YouTube or Facebook or anything else, matter one bit if companies like United can’t figure out how to handle them. Christi Day, the woman behind the Facebook and Twitter profiles for Southwest airlines, wants you to know one thing: “The main thing that our customers need to know is that we hear them.” And it seems they do. They hear the noise we’re making, they just fail to understand the words.

Deleted Pictures Persist on Social Networking Sites

Facebook and MySpace.Most everyone has seen or heard of social networking sites affecting privacy in crazy ways. They’ve cost people jobs, ended countless relationships, and in the best cases, resulted in some bruised pride. As more people get hit, more users are choosing to remove questionable content from their pages, but the content’s not necessarily gone.

Ars Technica’s Jacqui Cheng put recent findings from Cambridge University researchers to the test with some unsavory results. Turns out your deleted pictures may not be as far gone as you’d like.

Jacqui tested Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and Flickr with the same method. She deleted pictures from each site on May 21st and then watched the direct links for six weeks. Twitter and Flickr were both good, truly deleting the pictures after a hard refresh. MySpace and Facebook didn’t fare so well. Direct links from both sites still produce the “deleted” images, some six weeks after they were pulled.

Moral of the story? Continue to censor your drunken impulses, particularly with regard to the pictures you upload.

Did the Zune Phone Just Leak via Twitter?

Did they just announce the Zune Phone via Twitter?Everyone is looking to Microsoft after a few recent tweets on a Twitter account that’s run by the Office 2010 team. The tweets are as follows:

June 2009 will be an important month for Zune lovers.

New product launch, that’s all I’m allowed to say. Hold off from buying an iPhone/Pre. 🙂

Of course no rumor comes without its fair share of oddities. This one, for instance, comes from a marketing rep who claims the new version of word will integrate with social networking sites. Lolwut? Facebook in Word? Why?

Also, suggesting to hold off an a phone purchase for the imminent…announcement of a new MS product? That’s all this can be, right? An announcement. Which means months and months of waiting assuming we like what we see (and if it’s really a Zune phone, I doubt we will). Of course, recent Microsoft ads do suggest the company is both panicky and losing the better sense of judgement. Could this be the fallout?

QQ Queue: Oprah Kills Twitter?

QQ Queue is a special feature covering widespread weeping across the blogosphere. Crybabies beware: this feature is ruthless.

TwitterIf you’re in tune with the tech scene, you’ve probably heard about the Kutcher/CNN race to 1 million Twitter devotees. The dashing celeb threw down the gauntlet when he noticed both his own massive following and CNN’s similar numbers. As you can see from the link above, though, the battle was not one-sided. CNN tried to keep pace with breaking news updates about the current standings. In the end, Ashton won, but not before sucking world-class companies like EA into the ridiculous scrim.

Enter Oprah. Billionaire, Cultural Icon, Celebrity so big She gets the words that describe Her capitalized. Oprah saw CNN and Ashton duking it out and decided to enter the fray. Today she’s hosting Kutcher and (gasp) joining Twitter! This is…ridiculous.

First of all, Twitter from people like, come to think of it almost anyone, is pointless. Yes there are stories of Twitter helping people out of tight spots (like Egyptian prison). Yes there are some journalistic benefits. For the most part, though, Twitter is just adding to the noise. Knowing that someone is eating a sandwich or drinking coffee or getting a haircut (all of which are being tweeted as I write this) is not relationship building, despite what Twitter’s promo video says. These little blurbs are no more real human interactions than a video camera cataloguing a person’s life would be.

So why do I care? Continue reading »

Newer posts »

© 2026 Gadget Teaser

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑