	
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>social media &#8211; Gadget Teaser</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/social-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com</link>
	<description>Tracking the gadget and tech revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 21:20:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.14</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Verizon abandons new fees</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2011/12/31/verizon-abandons-new-fees/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2011/12/31/verizon-abandons-new-fees/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Staff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Dec 2011 21:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile phone fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone fees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon fees]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=4475</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Public pressure can build quickly in the social media age. Verizon tried to push through a new $2 fee and ended up with a PR nightmare. Verizon Wireless bowed to a torrent of criticism on Friday and reversed a day-old plan to impose a $2 bill-paying fee that would have applied to only some customers. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2011/12/31/verizon-abandons-new-fees/">Verizon abandons new fees</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Public pressure can build quickly in the social media age. Verizon tried to push through a new $2 fee and ended up with a <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/31/business/media/verizon-wireless-abandons-2-fee-after-consumer-outcry.html?src=me&#038;ref=business" target="_blank">PR nightmare</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Verizon Wireless bowed to a torrent of criticism on Friday and reversed a day-old plan to impose a $2 bill-paying fee that would have applied to only some customers.</p>
<p>The consumer vitriol, which cascaded across Twitter and onto blogs and petitions all around the Web, struck a chord with a company that was clearly not expecting it.</p>
<p>“The company made the decision in response to customer feedback about the plan, which was designed to improve the efficiency of those transactions,” Verizon Wireless said in a statement referring to the reversal.</p></blockquote>
<p>Everything is changing, as consumers have real power now with social media.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2011/12/31/verizon-abandons-new-fees/">Verizon abandons new fees</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2011/12/31/verizon-abandons-new-fees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google launches Google+</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2011/07/10/google-launches-google/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2011/07/10/google-launches-google/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 21:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media startup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=4315</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s been a long time coming, but Google has finally made a serious entry into the social media market. It took three attempts &#8211; you remember Wave and Buzz right? No? That&#8217;s okay, no one does &#8211; but it looks like Google may finally have a winner on its hands. Still, Google+ has a long [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2011/07/10/google-launches-google/">Google launches Google+</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bullz-eye.com/gadgets/features/2011/google_plus.htm" target="_blank"></p>
<p class="photo_center"><img decoding="async" src="http://www.bullz-eye.com/gadgets/features/2011/images/google_plus.jpg" alt="Google+" /></p>
<p></a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s been a long time coming, but Google has finally made a serious entry into the social media market. It took three attempts &#8211; you remember Wave and Buzz right? No? That&#8217;s okay, no one does &#8211; but it looks like Google may finally have a winner on its hands. </p>
<p>Still, <a href="http://www.bullz-eye.com/gadgets/features/2011/google_plus.htm" target="_blank">Google+ has a long way to go</a>. The service has launched to a relatively small group of users and continue to be limited by invites, but that could provide the kind of hype Google wants for a new service. Here&#8217;s an excerpt from an article I wrote about the service for Bullz-Eye:</p>
<blockquote><p>One of the coolest parts of Google+ is Hangout, which allows users to jump into text and video chat rooms with customizable accessibility. It’s a product that could easily punch a hole in Skype and become an amazing productivity tool. That’s especially true for the companies that have made the transition to Google’s online products.</p>
<p>Sparks, on the other hand, is the service’s big flop. It’s meant to be some sort of social news feed, but it’s cumbersome instead of sleek, slow instead of fast, and skimpy where it should be overflowing with information. Sparks actually surprises me in its shortcomings. Google has mountains of information about me. I’m always signed in to its email service, I use the search engine exclusively, I have an Android phone, I use Google Reader on a daily basis, and I’m writing this article in Google Docs. Why is it so hard for me to get a decent feed on Sparks?</p></blockquote>
<p>For the rest of the article, head over to the <a href="http://www.bullz-eye.com/gadgets/features/2011/google_plus.htm" target="_blank">Bullz-Eye Gadgets channel</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2011/07/10/google-launches-google/">Google launches Google+</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2011/07/10/google-launches-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>What will it take to bring down Facebook?</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/11/01/what-will-it-take-to-bring-down-facebook/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 18:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual relationships]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=3896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>A few months ago I went through and cleaned house on my Facebook account. My big problem with the service is exactly what makes it so popular &#8211; the prioritization of broad, largely meaningless connections over close, intimate ones. I dumped my broad connections, and it felt great. That&#8217;s where Facebook falls short, and where [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/11/01/what-will-it-take-to-bring-down-facebook/">What will it take to bring down Facebook?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://static.technorati.com/10/09/17/18465/Facebook-icon.png" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" class="photo_right_noborder" width="250" height="250" src="http://static.technorati.com/10/09/17/18465/Facebook-icon.png" alt="Facebook icon." /></a>A few months ago I went through and cleaned house on my Facebook account. My big problem with the service is exactly what makes it so popular &#8211; the prioritization of broad, largely meaningless connections over close, intimate ones. I dumped my broad connections, and it felt great. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s where Facebook falls short, and where there&#8217;s room for a serious competitor. As Facebook pushes ever closer to a billion users, there&#8217;s really no way anyone will unseat it &#8211; not immediately, anyway &#8211; but someone could easily steal a lot of time from Facebook users by simply creating a more closed and intimate network. It&#8217;s a strategy that venture capitalist Dave McClure covers in detail on his blog, <a href="http://500hats.typepad.com/500blogs/2010/10/how-to-take-down-facebook.html" target="_blank">Master of 500 Hats</a>.</p>
<p>A quick excerpt:</p>
<blockquote><p>I&#8217;ve got too many goddamn friends on Facebook.</p>
<p>yeah, that&#8217;s right: i&#8217;ve got over 2,000 &#8220;friends&#8221; on FB, and it&#8217;s fucking KILLING me.  Now admittedly most normal folks don&#8217;t have *that* many Facebook friends &#8212; true: i&#8217;m tremendously insecure, an only child, &#038; a pathetic people pleaser &#8212; but regardless a lot of &#8220;normal&#8221; people have the same problem with only a few hundred friends. and i&#8217;m guessing neither they nor i want to share our most jealously-guarded deep dark secrets with *everyone* on Facebook.  but they might just share it with a smaller subset.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://500hats.typepad.com/500blogs/2010/10/how-to-take-down-facebook.html" target="_blank">Read the full post here</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/11/01/what-will-it-take-to-bring-down-facebook/">What will it take to bring down Facebook?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Aardvaark considering an offer from Google</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/12/07/aardvaark-considering-an-offer-from-google/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/12/07/aardvaark-considering-an-offer-from-google/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 05:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aardvark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aardvark for sale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aardvark purchased]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[startups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venture capital]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=2433</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Aardvark, a social service that allows you to ask friends and other members to answer questions and give advice, is reportedly considering a buyout from Google. There&#8217;s no official word on price, but the rumor is that it&#8217;s over $30 million. To date the company has raised around $6 million in venture capital. As TechCrunch [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/12/07/aardvaark-considering-an-offer-from-google/">Aardvaark considering an offer from Google</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://techgeist.net/files/2009/10/vark-logo.jpg" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" class="photo_right_noborder" width="250" height="205" src="http://techgeist.net/files/2009/10/vark-logo.jpg" alt="vark.com logo." /></a>Aardvark, a social service that allows you to ask friends and other members to answer questions and give advice, is reportedly considering a buyout from <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/google">Google</a>. There&#8217;s no official word on price, but the rumor is that it&#8217;s over $30 million. To date the company has raised around $6 million in venture capital. </p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/06/aardvark-mulls-over-a-30-million-offer-from-google/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">TechCrunch has it</a>, Aardvark isn&#8217;t just talking to Google, it&#8217;s shopping around. There&#8217;s even the option of acquiring more VC for sale of some personal stock from the founders. I was actually surprised to hear that the valuation was so high. Aardvark is a fun way to kill some time and it&#8217;s got a great <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/category/iphone">iPhone</a> app, but I&#8217;ve asked so many questions that have gone unanswered I lost interest pretty quickly (seriously, no one can tell me the name of that composer). If I were these guys, I&#8217;d take the money and never look back. </p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/12/06/aardvark-mulls-over-a-30-million-offer-from-google/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&#038;utm_content=Google+Reader" target="_blank">TechCrunch</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/12/07/aardvaark-considering-an-offer-from-google/">Aardvaark considering an offer from Google</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/12/07/aardvaark-considering-an-offer-from-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter removes deleted tweets</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/10/25/twitter-removes-deleted-tweets/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 19:13:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biz stone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deleted content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deleted tweets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[user-owned content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[who owns social media content]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=2166</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Since its beginning, Twitter has tried to make it clear that your tweets are your property. You make them, you control who can see them. Problem was, the micro-blogging site couldn&#8217;t make good on that promise until recently, when it finally figured out how to keep deleted tweets out of search results. Up until the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/10/25/twitter-removes-deleted-tweets/">Twitter removes deleted tweets</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://i.zdnet.com/blogs/twitter-tweet.png" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" class="photo_right" border="0" width="250" height="250" src="http://i.zdnet.com/blogs/twitter-tweet.png" alt="Twitter bird." /></a>Since its beginning, <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/twitter">Twitter</a> has tried to make it clear that your tweets are your property. You make them, you control who can see them. Problem was, the micro-blogging site couldn&#8217;t make good on that promise until recently, when it finally figured out how to keep deleted tweets out of search results. </p>
<p>Up until the end of this week, users could type your name into the search box and get every tweet, even those you deleted. If there was something you didn&#8217;t mean to post or wanted to correct, that little bit of info was there too. Thankfully, Biz Stone &#038; Co. fixed that little problem. Now that problematic material is gone. Permanently. </p>
<p>Now all you have to worry about are the scores of sites cropping up to index tweets. Depending how those sites gather and store info, your deleted material may be a little more public than you&#8217;d hope. Yeah, drunk tweeting is still probably a terrible idea. </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/10/25/twitter-removes-deleted-tweets/">Twitter removes deleted tweets</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vivox Is Coming To Facebook</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/15/vivox-is-coming-to-facebook/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 02:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eve online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[skype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vivox]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=1899</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s Vivox? You may be using the service without knowing it. Vivox currently delivers in-game voice chat for EVE and Second Life a boasts more than 15 million users. But the service is looking to expand into a much bigger market: Facebook. Yes, live voice chat is coming to Facebook, and I just have one [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/15/vivox-is-coming-to-facebook/">Vivox Is Coming To Facebook</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gamasutra.com/db_area/images/news2001/19664/vivox.JPG" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="photo_right_noborder" src="http://www.gamasutra.com/db_area/images/news2001/19664/vivox.JPG" width="200" height="200" alt="Vivox logo." /></a>What&#8217;s Vivox? You may be using the service without knowing it. Vivox currently delivers in-game voice chat for <em>EVE</em> and <em>Second Life</em> a boasts more than 15 million users. But the service is looking to expand into a much bigger market: Facebook. </p>
<p>Yes, live voice chat is coming to Facebook, and I just have one thing to say: Thank god for <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/11/facebook-lite-is-like-an-answered-prayer/" target="_blank">Facebook Lite</a>. I hate to sound curmudgeonly, and no one likes a broken record, but voice chat is the last thing I want from people on Facebook. I realize this is great news for people who use Facebook as a primary method of communication. For all of you this could be really fantastic news.</p>
<p>I will say, the service actually sounds really cool. It offers conference support, and users outside Facebook will be able to call in to participate in real-time chat, which could make keeping in touch a whole lot easier. One of the most interesting moves <a href="http://www.vivox.com/" target="_blank">Vivox</a> is making, though, is releasing the source code to other third-party app developers.</p>
<p>Vivox will run on Facebook as a plug-in, so it&#8217;s not technically part of the core set of Facebook features. By opening up the source code, Vivox is giving voice chat to anything from games to utilities. It&#8217;s pretty easy to see how Facebook is swallowing up other social services at an alarming rate. It&#8217;s nabbed chat from AIM, integrated Twitter-like features, and now looks to go after Skype. Granted, this isn&#8217;t Facbeook proper doing the last, but it&#8217;s pretty close, and this kind of integration could turn Zuckerberg&#8217;s eyes to Vivox, and potentially open his wallet.</p>
<p>For now Vivox is testing in closed beta, and probably won&#8217;t go public for a while. When it does, I&#8217;ll be sure to let you know, probably by mentioning once again just how much I hate Facebook. </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/15/vivox-is-coming-to-facebook/">Vivox Is Coming To Facebook</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>T-Mobile Sidekick Gets Facebook And Twitter</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/05/t-mobile-sidekick-gets-facebook-and-twitter/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 01:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sidekick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[t-mobile sidekick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tmobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=1838</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>T-Mobile&#8217;s Sidekick got the smartphone treatment today with the addition of Facebook and Twitter applications to the Sidekick Download Catalog. As one of the most prominent phones to implement a full keyboard and some proprietary messaging features, it&#8217;s really been a long time coming. The applications work with the Sidekick 2008, the Sidekick LX, and [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/05/t-mobile-sidekick-gets-facebook-and-twitter/">T-Mobile Sidekick Gets Facebook And Twitter</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.hiptop3.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/sklx09_twitter.png" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="photo_right" border="0" width="250" height="219" src="http://www.hiptop3.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/sklx09_twitter.png" alt="Twitter on the Sidekick. " /></a>T-Mobile&#8217;s Sidekick got the smartphone treatment today with the addition of Facebook and Twitter applications to the Sidekick Download Catalog. As one of the most prominent phones to implement a full keyboard and some proprietary messaging features, it&#8217;s really been a long time coming. The applications work with the Sidekick 2008, the Sidekick LX, and the Sidekick Slide. </p>
<p>The Facebook application is free but the Twitter app will run you $2 a month. I gotta say, $24 a year for Twitter use seems a little out of hand. It&#8217;s also strange considering the Sidekick 2009 comes pre-packaged with free apps for both Facebook and Twitter. Was Twitter really that much harder to integrate into the old phones than Facebook? Did they just not have as much developer support? Is the app just that cool? </p>
<p>If you have an older Sidekick and the time to drop a comment, let us know. This is a strange one. </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/05/t-mobile-sidekick-gets-facebook-and-twitter/">T-Mobile Sidekick Gets Facebook And Twitter</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.gadgetteaser.com @ 2026-10-30 10:06:06 by W3 Total Cache
-->