	
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iphone exclusivity &#8211; Gadget Teaser</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/iphone-exclusivity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com</link>
	<description>Tracking the gadget and tech revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:52:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>iPhone Nano coming in 2010?</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/11/08/iphone-nano-coming-in-2010/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 23:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att exclusivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cdma iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cmda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone exclusivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone nano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[small iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[umts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon iPhone]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=2247</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>iPhone Nano rumors started to resurface this week, based on photos from a manufacturer and supposed insider reports that Apple is working up a device for Verizon’s CDMA network. The rumored device would sport a hybrid UMTS/CDMA radio, making it compatible with pretty much any network. The screen is down from 3.5 inches to 2.8, [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/11/08/iphone-nano-coming-in-2010/">iPhone Nano coming in 2010?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://techtickerblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/iphone-nano.jpg" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" class="photo_right_noborder" width="250" height="214" src="http://techtickerblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/iphone-nano.jpg" alt="iPhone nano?" /></a>iPhone Nano rumors started to resurface this week, based on photos from a manufacturer and supposed insider reports that <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/category/apple">Apple</a> is working up a device for Verizon’s CDMA network. </p>
<p>The rumored device would sport a hybrid UMTS/CDMA radio, making it compatible with pretty much any network. The screen is down from 3.5 inches to 2.8, which seems way too small to me. Granted, there&#8217;s always zooming to get to hard to read text, but there&#8217;s really nothing worse than scrolling a page around while you&#8217;re trying to read. </p>
<p>Speculation points to a 2010 release, which would make sense considering the massive Android rollout that has been taking place. As <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/android">Android</a> makes it onto more devices, particularly cheaper ones, Apple’s going to want a way to get those entry-level smartphone owners. A smaller iPhone might not get those folks, but a cheaper one definitely would. </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/11/08/iphone-nano-coming-in-2010/">iPhone Nano coming in 2010?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Droid isn&#8217;t just for Verizon</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/10/24/droid-isnt-just-for-verizon/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:09:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[at&t phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[droid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google voice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[idon't]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone exclusivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone killer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[motorola]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon ads]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=2164</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The most recent info on Motorola&#8217;s Droid suggests that the phone isn&#8217;t just for Verizon. In fact, it looks like there&#8217;s a GSM model that would work on AT&#038;T&#8217;s 3G network, as well as Canada&#8217;s Rogers. So it looks like the new name for the &#8220;Droid&#8221; is now &#8220;Sholes,&#8221; at least pre-release. That&#8217;s the name [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/10/24/droid-isnt-just-for-verizon/">Droid isn&#8217;t just for Verizon</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.gryllus.net/Blender/Project_Images/starwars.jpg" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" class="photo_right" border="0" width="250" height="281" src="http://www.gryllus.net/Blender/Project_Images/starwars.jpg" alt="Droids for AT&#038;T." /></a>The most recent info on Motorola&#8217;s Droid suggests that the phone isn&#8217;t just for Verizon. In fact, it looks like there&#8217;s a GSM model that would work on AT&#038;T&#8217;s 3G network, as well as Canada&#8217;s Rogers. </p>
<p>So it looks like the new name for the &#8220;<a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/droid">Droid</a>&#8221; is now &#8220;Sholes,&#8221; at least pre-release. That&#8217;s the name buried deep in the FCC docs that also show the AT&#038;T 3G bandwidths. To me the big advantage of the phone would be that it&#8217;s a nice piece of hardware for anything other than AT&#038;T. If I was going with <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/at&#038;t">AT&#038;T</a>, I think I&#8217;d still stick to the iPhone. Android still has some catching up to do in the app department for me to genuinely consider a switch. Although there is that Google Voice thing&#8230;</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/10/24/droid-isnt-just-for-verizon/">Droid isn&#8217;t just for Verizon</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Epic Fail: AT&#038;T Considers New iPhone-Exclusive Features</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/07/epic-fail-att-considers-new-iphone-exclusive-features/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/07/epic-fail-att-considers-new-iphone-exclusive-features/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att iphone-exclusive features]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att service notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone carrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone contract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone exclusivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overage notice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual voicemail]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=1842</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>AT&#038;T knows you aren&#8217;t happy with your iPhone service. It&#8217;s making videos to try to explain away some of your woes, but the company may also be looking to add new iPhone-exclusive features to improve the user experience. According to a story at Apple Insider, Apple and AT&#038;T are looking into a software update that [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/07/epic-fail-att-considers-new-iphone-exclusive-features/">Epic Fail: AT&#038;T Considers New iPhone-Exclusive Features</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://mrbesilly.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341bfa6953ef011571083a90970b-500wi" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" class="photo_right_noborder" width="250" height="206" src="http://mrbesilly.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341bfa6953ef011571083a90970b-500wi" alt="AT&#038;T is full of fail." /></a>AT&#038;T knows you aren&#8217;t happy with your iPhone service. It&#8217;s making videos to try to <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/05/att-hopes-seth-can-placate-the-masses/" target="_blank">explain away some of your woes</a>, but the company may also be looking to add new iPhone-exclusive features to improve the user experience. </p>
<p>According to a <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/09/09/07/new_att_specific_features_rumored_for_future_iphone_update.html" target="_blank">story at Apple Insider</a>, Apple and AT&#038;T are looking into a software update that would add features to improve customer satisfaction. Among the rumored list of features are overage alerts, which would offer push notifications if you&#8217;re past your text limit, for instance. There&#8217;s also the potential for a &#8220;Voicemail&#8221; tab in the settings app, allowing you to disable the custom voicemail greetings on your own phone and bypass those greetings when you call other AT&#038;T subscribers.</p>
<p>From what we know so far, this plan is a joke. The phone is fine. These features might be nice additions, but as almost every single survey has shown, iPhone owners love the phone and loathe AT&#038;T. Adding these features to the phone will just exacerbate that issue. Sure, callers can get to my voicemail faster, but if <em>I can&#8217;t listen to their messages</em> what does it matter? </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t need features to improve my experience, I need more reliable service. When AT&#038;T stops wasting time and money on gimmicks like this and allocates those resources to network improvement the average iPhone user experience will improve. </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/07/epic-fail-att-considers-new-iphone-exclusive-features/">Epic Fail: AT&#038;T Considers New iPhone-Exclusive Features</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/07/epic-fail-att-considers-new-iphone-exclusive-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>AT&#038;T Hopes Seth Can Placate The Masses</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/05/att-hopes-seth-can-placate-the-masses/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/05/att-hopes-seth-can-placate-the-masses/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att death star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att fail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att failures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att iphone service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att placate customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att pr snafu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att service issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att service problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att sucks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exclusivity problems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone exclusivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no more exclusivity contracts]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=1833</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Look we see the discussions on the web,&#8221; says Seth Bloom. He&#8217;s also known as &#8220;Seth the blogger guy,&#8221; and he&#8217;s featured in a new video by AT&#038;T. The video attempts to describe the MMS delay we&#8217;ve experienced and explain away our complaints with talk of network traffic and increased smartphone use. The video, which [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/05/att-hopes-seth-can-placate-the-masses/">AT&#038;T Hopes Seth Can Placate The Masses</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://stormen.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/att-deathstar.jpg" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="photo_right" border="0" width="250" height="250" src="http://stormen.files.wordpress.com/2009/07/att-deathstar.jpg" alt="AT&#038;T Death Star." /></a>&#8220;Look we see the discussions on the web,&#8221; says Seth Bloom. He&#8217;s also known as &#8220;Seth the blogger guy,&#8221; and he&#8217;s featured in a new video by AT&#038;T. The video attempts to describe the MMS delay we&#8217;ve experienced and explain away our complaints with talk of network traffic and increased smartphone use. </p>
<p>The video, which you can see below, is just flat out insulting. It seems to suggest that AT&#038;T&#8217;s service sucks by no fault of their own, and that maybe if you just took the time to understand a cellular network you would realize that fact. I&#8217;ll grant <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/att">AT&#038;T</a> the fact that the iPhone probably would have crippled any network, but the responsibility would still lie with the carrier. It&#8217;s time to stop pretending AT&#038;T isn&#8217;t making billions of dollars by <em>not</em> providing the service millions of people signed contracts for. </p>
<p>If anything, Seth should be decrying American carrier exclusivity contracts or the ridiculously low standards to which our wireless carriers are held. But Seth won&#8217;t do that, because he&#8217;s only here to humanize AT&#038;T, to explain away our woes, and to get us to really feel for a company that can&#8217;t provide what consumers are paying for.</p>
<p>The worst part of this video is that people are going to gobble up this bullshit and regurgitate it to all of their friends. Even reputable news sources, <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/171458/" target="_blank">sources that should know better</a>, are blaming the iPhone for strangling AT&#038;T networks, like AT&#038;T just watched as <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/category/apple">Apple</a> muscled its way onto the carrier&#8217;s network and starting eating up bandwidth. Let&#8217;s not forget, people, that AT&#038;T helped orchestrate this thing. The fact that they weren&#8217;t and still aren&#8217;t prepared to handle the network load is no one&#8217;s fault but their own. </p>
<p>Every time I read an article lauding the giant sums wireless carriers spend to upgrade their networks I want to vomit. These companies aren&#8217;t dying. They aren&#8217;t struggling. A lot of them are growing as much as 5% year over year in the face a recession. That&#8217;s not exactly the profile of a company I can feel sorry for. </p>
<p>As consumers we need to stop believing this trash. Stop listening when AT&#038;T says it&#8217;s &#8220;working on it,&#8221; and instead continue to write letters. Continue to lodge complaints. Hell, continue filling lawsuits for breach of contract on the part of AT&#038;T. Videos like this are doing nothing more than telling you to accept shit service lying down because there&#8217;s nothing to be done about it. There is, we just aren&#8217;t loud enough to make AT&#038;T pay for it yet. </p>
<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/u5yIVgj0VVA&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/u5yIVgj0VVA&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/05/att-hopes-seth-can-placate-the-masses/">AT&#038;T Hopes Seth Can Placate The Masses</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2009/09/05/att-hopes-seth-can-placate-the-masses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.gadgetteaser.com @ 2026-04-19 08:20:01 by W3 Total Cache
-->