	
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ibooks &#8211; Gadget Teaser</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/ibooks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com</link>
	<description>Tracking the gadget and tech revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:19:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Sorry film nerds, a widescreen iPad doesn&#8217;t make sense</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/04/06/sorry-film-nerds-a-widescreen-ipad-doesnt-make-sense/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/04/06/sorry-film-nerds-a-widescreen-ipad-doesnt-make-sense/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 00:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie viewing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widescreen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widescreen movies]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=3042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>When the iPad was first announced there was a lot of crying about the screen size. If the thing was meant for watching video why wouldn&#8217;t it have a 16:9 aspect ratio? I mean, who wants black bars on the size of an already smaller screen than you might be used to. I do, actually. [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/04/06/sorry-film-nerds-a-widescreen-ipad-doesnt-make-sense/">Sorry film nerds, a widescreen iPad doesn&#8217;t make sense</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/01/28/article-0-080E80B3000005DC-379_468x342.jpg" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" class="photo_right" border="0" width="250" height="182" src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2010/01/28/article-0-080E80B3000005DC-379_468x342.jpg" alt="Apple's iPad." /></a>When the <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/category/ipad">iPad</a> was first announced there was a lot of crying about the screen size. If the thing was meant for watching video why wouldn&#8217;t it have a 16:9 aspect ratio? I mean, who wants black bars on the size of an already smaller screen than you might be used to. </p>
<p>I do, actually. Why? The iPad is about more than just visual media consumption. Yes, movies are going to look great on that pretty little screen, but it needs to do more than that. From everything we&#8217;ve seen about the iPad (and everything you probably know if you&#8217;ve held one) it&#8217;s meant to be wielded a lot like a book. Imagine that book on a 16:9 aspect ratio. It would be ridiculously awkward to hold.</p>
<p>That says nothing of actually viewing content either. Reading websites, <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/category/ebooks">ebooks</a>, and browsing content like photos makes much more sense with a 4:3 screen. The iPad is not a purpose-built device; it&#8217;s designed for all sorts of content. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re really that concerned about a 16:9 screen, get yourself a JooJoo. I hear that company is doing very well.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/04/06/sorry-film-nerds-a-widescreen-ipad-doesnt-make-sense/">Sorry film nerds, a widescreen iPad doesn&#8217;t make sense</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/04/06/sorry-film-nerds-a-widescreen-ipad-doesnt-make-sense/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Random House won&#8217;t be on the iPad</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/03/25/why-random-house-wont-be-on-the-ipad/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/03/25/why-random-house-wont-be-on-the-ipad/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 06:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ereader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibooks publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad ibooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random house]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=2935</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>You might have noticed that one major publisher is missing from the list of iPad adopters: Random House. You might think it&#8217;s because it doesn&#8217;t believe in the platform, or it has some dispute with Apple. None of the above. As the Financial Times has it, it&#8217;s because Random House doesn&#8217;t want to get into [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/03/25/why-random-house-wont-be-on-the-ipad/">Why Random House won&#8217;t be on the iPad</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.appchatter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ipad_ibooks.jpg" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" fetchpriority="high" class="photo_right_noborder" width="250" height="298" src="http://www.appchatter.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ipad_ibooks.jpg" alt="iPad running iBooks." /></a>You might have noticed that one major publisher is missing from the list of iPad adopters: Random House. You might think it&#8217;s because it doesn&#8217;t believe in the platform, or it has some dispute with <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/category/apple">Apple</a>. None of the above. As the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4d11b5fc-36b9-11df-b810-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">Financial Times</a> has it, it&#8217;s because Random House doesn&#8217;t want to get into an ebook price war. </p>
<p>So let&#8217;s get this straight. To avoid a price war, the publisher is willing to stay with a company who requires a fixed price of $9.99? A company all the other publishers are glad to get away from? A company that is so desperate to keep publishers that it threatens to remove their goods from its store if those publishers don&#8217;t comply?</p>
<p>Yes. Apparently that. Granted, Apple&#8217;s model could potentially mean less profit per book for publishers because of the 30 percent cut it takes. It will make up for that, potentially, by giving publishers a little more control over their pricing and theoretically increasing the reach of ebooks. For the full story, head over to the <a href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4d11b5fc-36b9-11df-b810-00144feabdc0.html" target="_blank">Financial Times</a>.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/03/25/why-random-house-wont-be-on-the-ipad/">Why Random House won&#8217;t be on the iPad</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/03/25/why-random-house-wont-be-on-the-ipad/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon unveils Kindle Apps for Tablet Computers (including the iPad)</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/03/22/amazon-unveils-kindle-apps-for-tablet-computers-including-the-ipad/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[color ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[color kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad competitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle app]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle app for tablet computers]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=2925</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I almost laughed out loud when I saw the diminutive text that accompanied Amazon&#8217;s new Kindle Apps for Tablet Computers. It reads &#8220;Including the iPad,&#8221; in a tiny, scrunched up font. Funny content wars aside, the new app looks pretty great, and it gives us a look at the full color future of digital books [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/03/22/amazon-unveils-kindle-apps-for-tablet-computers-including-the-ipad/">Amazon unveils Kindle Apps for Tablet Computers (including the iPad)</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/kindle/www/navarro/interim/navarro-sect01-popover._V215370788_.jpg" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" class="photo_right" border="0" width="250" height="325" src="http://g-ecx.images-amazon.com/images/G/01/kindle/www/navarro/interim/navarro-sect01-popover._V215370788_.jpg" alt="Amazon Kindle App for Tablet Computers." /></a>I almost laughed out loud when I saw the diminutive text that accompanied Amazon&#8217;s new Kindle Apps for Tablet Computers. It reads &#8220;Including the <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/ipad">iPad</a>,&#8221; in a tiny, scrunched up font. Funny content wars aside, the new app looks pretty great, and it gives us a look at the full color future of digital books from <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/amazon">Amazon</a>. </p>
<p>The new app include fancy features like page turn animations and adjustable backgrounds while holding onto the Amazon Whispersync technology to keep your reading experience up to date across multiple devices. While this may be the future of reading with Amazon, it makes me wonder where the future of the company&#8217;s hardware lies. I still can&#8217;t imagine a world in which Amazon wanted to get into the hardware business for just a couple years, but maybe it did. It&#8217;s still the largest online retailer, and content distribution is really a nice business. Just ask Apple. </p>
<p>If the future of the <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/kindle">Kindle</a> brand lies in apps across all platforms, though, Amazon would do well not to piss off so many publishers. All the work Amazon has done to this point will be null if readers can&#8217;t get the books they want in the Kindle store. </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/03/22/amazon-unveils-kindle-apps-for-tablet-computers-including-the-ipad/">Amazon unveils Kindle Apps for Tablet Computers (including the iPad)</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Happy iPad pre-order day</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/03/12/happy-ipad-pre-order-day/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad orders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad pre-order]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screen orientation lock]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=2875</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The Apple Store went down this morning for the iPad pre-order update. It&#8217;s back up, giving the world access to the highest profile tablet we&#8217;ve yet seen. Apple has imposed a pre-order limit of two per customer, which has me wondering whether the company expects the kind of quantity problems that lead to mad eBay [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/03/12/happy-ipad-pre-order-day/">Happy iPad pre-order day</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/188185-apple-ipad-flash_original.jpg" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="photo_right_noborder" width="250" height="240" src="http://images.pcworld.com/news/graphics/188185-apple-ipad-flash_original.jpg" alt="iPad." /></a>The Apple Store went down this morning for the <a href="http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_ipad/family/ipad?mco=OTY2ODA0NQ" target="_blank">iPad pre-order</a> update. It&#8217;s back up, giving the world access to the highest profile tablet we&#8217;ve yet seen. Apple has imposed a pre-order limit of two per customer, which has me wondering whether the company expects the kind of quantity problems that lead to mad eBay selloffs. </p>
<p>The store update also revealed pricing on iPad accessories. That nifty little keyboard dock will run $69 while a regular dock is just $29. You can also get the official <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/ipad">iPad</a> case for $39. The update also revealed a nice new feature on the iPad &#8211; screen orientation lock. It&#8217;s a great idea for anyone hoping to use the iPad as an ereader. It allows you to hold the device in any position and maintain the screen. The auto-flip has frustrated me on the iPhone on occasion so its nice to see the problem addressed for a device designed for reading. </p>
<p>Prices start at $499.00. Will you be getting one?</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://store.apple.com/us/browse/home/shop_ipad/family/ipad?mco=OTY2ODA0NQ" target="_blank">Apple Store</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/03/12/happy-ipad-pre-order-day/">Happy iPad pre-order day</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reading Material: The iPad rocks for content creators</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/03/10/reading-material-the-ipad-rocks-for-content-creators/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/03/10/reading-material-the-ipad-rocks-for-content-creators/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content and form]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook format]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ereader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[form vs content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet pc]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=2864</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of talk about the iPad and its potential to revolutionize the publishing industry. I&#8217;ve never really bought it, though I couldn&#8217;t always say why. I didn&#8217;t think the new form would really encourage publishers to change all that much. Penguin proved me wrong in its discussion of new iPad content, but [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/03/10/reading-material-the-ipad-rocks-for-content-creators/">Reading Material: The iPad rocks for content creators</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ilounge.com/images/uploads/ipad-ibooks.jpg" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="photo_right_noborder" width="250" height="179" src="http://www.ilounge.com/images/uploads/ipad-ibooks.jpg" alt="iPad with iBooks." /></a>There&#8217;s been a lot of talk about the iPad and its potential to revolutionize the <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/ebooks">publishing</a> industry. I&#8217;ve never really bought it, though I couldn&#8217;t always say why. I didn&#8217;t think the new form would really encourage publishers to change all that much. Penguin proved me wrong in its discussion of new iPad content, but even Penguin didn&#8217;t completely sway me. This <a href="http://craigmod.com/journal/ipad_and_books/" target="_blank">article by a book designer named Craig Mod</a> did. </p>
<p>Craig&#8217;s whole point is that the iPad not only offers something new, it offers something very old &#8211; the experience of reading an actual book. His position is that the <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/ipad">iPad</a> <em>preserves</em> the book by more realistically allowing publishers to port their published form, books, onto a new device. The Kindle could only approximate things with its black and white display. By contrast (wink, wink), the iPad&#8217;s full color gives publishers the tools they&#8217;ve always had for creating rich content experiences. The arrival of links and what we now consider &#8220;content-rich&#8221; experiences are just icing on the cake. </p>
<p>His article offers a long and winding history of designing books and the kind of thought that goes into a reading experience. It&#8217;s worth reading for anyone interested in the future of the written word and/or a passion for creating consumable content. </p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://craigmod.com/journal/ipad_and_books/" target="_blank">@craigmod</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/03/10/reading-material-the-ipad-rocks-for-content-creators/">Reading Material: The iPad rocks for content creators</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/03/10/reading-material-the-ipad-rocks-for-content-creators/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon tries to stay competitive with Apple, will need a new device</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/02/27/amazon-tries-to-stay-competitive-with-apple-will-need-a-new-device/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 23:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ereader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad ereader]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad vs kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jeff bezos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=2815</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The day Apple announced the iPad, Amazon was calling newspapers and publishers before Steve Jobs had even left the stage. As the New York Times&#8217; Bits blog has it, Amazon wanted to hear what Apple had offered. Amazon had been trying for more than a month to sign deals with publishers that would give Amazon [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/02/27/amazon-tries-to-stay-competitive-with-apple-will-need-a-new-device/">Amazon tries to stay competitive with Apple, will need a new device</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.csmonitor.com/var/ezflow_site/storage/images/media/images/0127-steve-jobs-carry-ipad/7306007-1-eng-US/0127-steve-jobs-carry-ipad_full_600.jpg" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="photo_right" border="0" width="250" height="167" src="http://www.csmonitor.com/var/ezflow_site/storage/images/media/images/0127-steve-jobs-carry-ipad/7306007-1-eng-US/0127-steve-jobs-carry-ipad_full_600.jpg" alt="Steve Jobs in a chair with the iPad." /></a>The day Apple announced the iPad, <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/amazon">Amazon</a> was calling newspapers and publishers before Steve Jobs had even left the stage. As the New York Times&#8217; Bits blog has it, Amazon wanted to hear what Apple had offered. Amazon had been trying for more than a month to sign deals with publishers that would give Amazon customers the best prices anywhere, either by matching or beating the prices given to other dealers. </p>
<p>Amazon tried to sweeten the deal by offering publishers bigger revenues than in the past. Unfortunately, Apple was willing to budge on a much larger issue: price. With Apple, publishers had a bit more flexibility than Amazon would give, which in turn gave publishers bargaining power over Amazon. See, Amazon will do just about anything to stay competitive with <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/category/apple">Apple</a>. </p>
<p>In fairness to Amazon, it&#8217;s not like publishers want to upset that distribution channel. Amazon pretty much pioneered the <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/ebooks">ebook</a> scene &#8211; it certainly made ebooks as popular as they were likely to become before some sort of wonder device came along &#8211; which leaves publishers keen to cater to the existing subscribers in Amazon&#8217;s marketplace until either the iPad gains enough ground or Amazon releases a new reader. </p>
<p>That last point is very important. If Amazon doesn&#8217;t release a new reader within the next year or so, it will pigeonhole itself into becoming solely a content provider, a position I wouldn&#8217;t think Bezos wants to be in considering he started the Kindle. Rarely would a company of Amazon&#8217;s scale introduce a middling product only to do away with it in a couple years. </p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/02/26/when-it-comes-to-content-amazons-kindle-wont-be-undersold/" target="_blank">Bits</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/02/27/amazon-tries-to-stay-competitive-with-apple-will-need-a-new-device/">Amazon tries to stay competitive with Apple, will need a new device</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital music price flexibility resulted in slower sales</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/02/10/digital-music-price-flexibility-resulted-in-slower-sales/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:22:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook pricing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hachette]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harpercollins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macmillan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warner music group]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=2718</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Warner Music Group delivered some interesting news in the wake of the Macmillan/Amazon standoff. When Warner was finally given pricing flexibility for its iTunes content last April it kicked off a slow decline in sales growth. As Warner put things, year to year “digital track equivalent album unit growth” was down from 10 percent in [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/02/10/digital-music-price-flexibility-resulted-in-slower-sales/">Digital music price flexibility resulted in slower sales</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pmpworldwide.com/_media/ax_content/itunes_money.png" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="photo_right_noborder" width="250" height="198" src="http://www.pmpworldwide.com/_media/ax_content/itunes_money.png" alt="iTunes sales slow with price flexibility." /></a>Warner Music Group delivered some interesting news in the wake of the Macmillan/Amazon standoff. When Warner was finally given pricing flexibility for its <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/itunes">iTunes</a> content last April it kicked off a slow decline in sales growth. </p>
<p>As Warner put things, year to year “digital track equivalent album unit growth” was down from 10 percent in the September quarter to just 5 percent for the December quarter. We can still blame the recession in part, but the decline didn&#8217;t begin until prices went up. As Peter Kafka at AllThingsD notes, the digital music business is much more mature than the ebook industry. Also, despite the decline in sales growth, Warner CEO Edgar Bronfman Jr. said the change has been a net positive for his company. </p>
<p>Despite the warnings for publishers in this news, I still think the <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/ebooks">ebook</a> industry is young enough to pull of the price increase without much negative impact. </p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://mediamemo.allthingsd.com/20100209/book-publishers-beware-at-itunes-expensive-music-equals-slower-sales/" target="_blank">AllThingsD</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/02/10/digital-music-price-flexibility-resulted-in-slower-sales/">Digital music price flexibility resulted in slower sales</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon gives Macmillan the price it wants</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/02/01/amazon-gives-macmillan-the-price-it-wants/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 06:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibook store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macmillan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=2679</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Following a very public feud over ebook pricing, Amazon has caved to Macmillan, giving the publisher it&#8217;s desired $14.99 price point for ebooks. The switch came after Macmillan threatened to pull all future publications from Amazon&#8217;s Kindle Store if it wasn&#8217;t given flexibility with regard to price. Amazon announced the news to its customers with [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/02/01/amazon-gives-macmillan-the-price-it-wants/">Amazon gives Macmillan the price it wants</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2010/02/01/alg_kindle.jpg" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="photo_right" border="0" width="250" height="169" src="http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2010/02/01/alg_kindle.jpg" alt="Macmillan back on the Kindle." /></a>Following a very public feud over ebook pricing, <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/amazon">Amazon</a> has caved to Macmillan, giving the publisher it&#8217;s desired $14.99 price point for ebooks. The switch came after Macmillan threatened to pull all future publications from Amazon&#8217;s Kindle Store if it wasn&#8217;t given flexibility with regard to price. </p>
<p>Amazon announced the news to its customers with the following statement:</p>
<blockquote><p>Dear Customers:</p>
<p>Macmillan, one of the “big six” publishers, has clearly communicated to us that, regardless of our viewpoint, they are committed to switching to an agency model and charging $12.99 to $14.99 for e-book versions of bestsellers and most hardcover releases.</p>
<p>We have expressed our strong disagreement and the seriousness of our disagreement by temporarily ceasing the sale of all Macmillan titles. We want you to know that ultimately, however, we will have to capitulate and accept Macmillan’s terms because Macmillan has a monopoly over their own titles, and we will want to offer them to you even at prices we believe are needlessly high for e-books. Amazon customers will at that point decide for themselves whether they believe it’s reasonable to pay $14.99 for a bestselling e-book. We don’t believe that all of the major publishers will take the same route as Macmillan. And we know for sure that many independent presses and self-published authors will see this as an opportunity to provide attractively priced e-books as an alternative.</p>
<p>Kindle is a business for Amazon, and it is also a mission. We never expected it to be easy!</p>
<p>Thank you for being a customer.</p></blockquote>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but feel Amazon is making an irrelevant appeal to the Kindle consumer base. By and large these will be people with more money to spend on books, considering they&#8217;ve dropped a couple hundred bucks up front to gain access to the titles. If they really want one of the books, would the consumer base really not buy because of a $15 price tag, one that&#8217;s still far cheaper than the hardback option? Probably not. </p>
<p>As a writer, I&#8217;m reassured to see publishers taking the reins on this one. </p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/tag/kindle/forum/ref=cm_cd_tfp_ef_tft_tp?_encoding=UTF8&#038;cdForum=Fx1D7SY3BVSESG&#038;cdThread=Tx2MEGQWTNGIMHV&#038;displayType=tagsDetail" target="_blank">Amazon</a></p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/02/01/amazon-gives-macmillan-the-price-it-wants/">Amazon gives Macmillan the price it wants</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Amazon pulls Macmillan ebooks</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/01/31/amazon-pulls-macmillan-ebooks/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/01/31/amazon-pulls-macmillan-ebooks/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 07:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibook store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kindle 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kindle store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macmillan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=2675</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>At some point yesterday Amazon pulled any ebooks from publisher Macmillan due to a pricing dispute, according to the New York Times. Apparently Macmillan wanted to raise prices from $9.99 to $15 and Amazon didn&#8217;t approve. You might remember the same thing happening as iTunes was starting to get its legs. Apple used its massive [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/01/31/amazon-pulls-macmillan-ebooks/">Amazon pulls Macmillan ebooks</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.thebookseller.com/images/uploaded/4801.jpg" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" class="photo_right" border="0" width="192" height="181" src="http://www.thebookseller.com/images/uploaded/4801.jpg" alt="iBook Store." /></a>At some point yesterday Amazon pulled any ebooks from publisher Macmillan due to a pricing dispute, according to the <em>New York Times</em>. Apparently Macmillan wanted to raise prices from $9.99 to $15 and Amazon didn&#8217;t approve. </p>
<p>You might remember the same thing happening as <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/itunes">iTunes</a> was starting to get its legs. Apple used its massive marketshare to strong arm media companies to the $.99 price point, which most everyone felt was too low. Obviously that model has worked out in Apple&#8217;s favor, if not in the favor of most record labels, a few of which were able to strike more flexible deals. </p>
<p>There is one major difference &#8211; Macmillan has somewhere to go. Apple is just about to open the iBook Store for its new iPad, which, in all likelihood, is going to outsell the Kindle by quite a bit. Most estimates put the Kindle&#8217;s installed base around 3 million. The iPad could easily have that by the end of this year. </p>
<p>I would be pretty surprised, though, if Jobs was willing to give Amazon the price advantage in the ebook war. </p>
<p>Source: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/01/29/amazon-pulls-macmillan-books-over-e-book-price-disagreement/</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/01/31/amazon-pulls-macmillan-ebooks/">Amazon pulls Macmillan ebooks</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/01/31/amazon-pulls-macmillan-ebooks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The iPad is here!</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/01/27/the-ipad-is-here/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/01/27/the-ipad-is-here/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lifestyle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad 3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad price]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad wi-fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steve jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet pc]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=2649</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The long wait is finally over. Today is officially tablet day, as Apple announced just moments ago. It&#8217;s an exciting day for all sorts of reasons, not the least of which is the way this device could shape the future of the digital word. Obviously that&#8217;s going to be a long process, but if we [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/01/27/the-ipad-is-here/">The iPad is here!</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Picture-21.png"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Picture-21.png" alt="Yerba Buena Apple decorations." title="Yerba Buena Apple decorations." width="250" height="132" class="photo_right" /></a>The long wait is finally over. Today is officially tablet day, as Apple announced just moments ago. It&#8217;s an exciting day for all sorts of reasons, not the least of which is the way this device could shape the future of the digital word. Obviously that&#8217;s going to be a long process, but if we know anything about Apple, it won&#8217;t seem so long, and we&#8217;ll soon be wondering how we did without (don&#8217;t act like you don&#8217;t love your iPod). </p>
<p>Jobs kicked things off today like this: “We want to kick off 2010 by introducing a truly magical product today.” Tease of the century. He launched into a quick (thankfully) overview of the company, but it wasn&#8217;t long before we got to the meat. The <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/apple-tablet">iPad</a>. That&#8217;s the official name for the long-rumored tablet device that Jobs calls &#8220;the best browsing experience you&#8217;ve ever had.&#8221; </p>
<p>Basically, it&#8217;s a big iPhone, with a really nice interface. The keyboard looks big enough to be typed on laptop style (Jobs demoed it this way) and it has that same great glass look that Apple is known for. For now, it runs iPhone apps, as in the apps can be downloaded as is and run either at iPhone resolution or doubled up for the iPad. There&#8217;s an SDK available for developers to get started.<br />
<a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Picture-31.png"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Picture-31.png" alt="The iPad." title="The iPad." width="477" height="298" class="photo_right_noborder" /></a><br />
As for hardware, there are a whole slew of options available. You can get everything from 16GB to 64GB flash storage, Wi-Fi and unlocked 3G support (yes, unlocked &#8211; thank you god), in whatever combination your heart desires. It runs on a 1GHz Apple A4 chip, so they aren&#8217;t dishing out any cash to Qualcomm for that dual-core Snapdragon. It is definitely fast enough to do some light photo/video editing on the fly, just like we would see from the iPhone. Really, though, I think I&#8217;d get the most use for watching HD video. </p>
<p>Of course the number we all care about is price. When <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/steve-jobs">Jobs</a> said the base model would be $499 I was shocked. More shocked than by anything else about the presentation. That&#8217;s like buying an iPod. That&#8217;s&#8230;insane. You can get as high as $829 if you&#8217;ve got the highest storage level and 3G support, but for what you get that&#8217;s an amazing price in my mind. </p>
<p>This thing will be the topic of conversation on every blog today, including this one. More posts on iBooks and what this means for the Kindle. Check back soon.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/01/27/the-ipad-is-here/">The iPad is here!</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/01/27/the-ipad-is-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.gadgetteaser.com @ 2026-04-11 19:17:05 by W3 Total Cache
-->