	
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>femtocell &#8211; Gadget Teaser</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/femtocell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com</link>
	<description>Tracking the gadget and tech revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:42:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.3.8</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The femtocell situation</title>
		<link>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/04/12/the-femtocell-situation/</link>
					<comments>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/04/12/the-femtocell-situation/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 21:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[att]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broadband cellular service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular reception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[femtocell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home cellular service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magicjack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microcell 3g]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sprint]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.gadgetteaser.com/?p=3061</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>After Gizmodo posted a quick review of AT&#038;T&#8217;s upcoming Microcell 3G, I wanted to take a look at the femtocell situation as a whole. By and large I think femtocells are a great idea. They provide a relatively low cost method for increasing your cell signal at home. The cost could be lower though, as [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/04/12/the-femtocell-situation/">The femtocell situation</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://assets.gearlive.com/blogimages/ATT_3G_MicroCell.jpg" target="_blank"><img decoding="async" class="photo_right" border="0" width="250" height="188" src="http://assets.gearlive.com/blogimages/ATT_3G_MicroCell.jpg" alt="Microcell 3G." /></a>After Gizmodo posted a <a href="http://gizmodo.com/5501008/att-microcell-3g-salvation-for-your-crappy-reception-is-150-no-strings-attached" target="_blank">quick review of AT&#038;T&#8217;s upcoming Microcell 3G</a>, I wanted to take a look at the femtocell situation as a whole. By and large I think femtocells are a great idea. They provide a relatively low cost method for increasing your cell signal at home. The cost could be lower though, as in free, and would breed a lot of good blood between provider and consumer. </p>
<p>As it stands there are a few options for a femtocell. There&#8217;s the AT&#038;T Microcell 3G, which costs $150 plus $20/month if you opt for the unlimited Microcell minutes plan. Without a plan your femtocell minutes will be deducted from your monthly account as usual. You can get Sprint&#8217;s Airave, which runs $100 plus $15/month for unlimited calls on one line. MagicJack is also reportedly releasing a femtocell, which will likely be the most reasonable of the bunch, at an undisclosed unit cost and the $20/year service fee. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to fault <a href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/tag/magicjack">MagicJack</a> for the yearly fee since it isn&#8217;t a service provider, and yet it provides the best service out of any of these solutions. It seems odd, in the case of AT&#038;T and Sprint to <em>pay</em> to use your <em>existing</em> broadband connection to send data more reliably than over the cellular network for which you also already <em>pay</em>. It reeks of customer extortion. </p>
<p>Consider an alternative &#8211; AT&#038;T says hey guys, we&#8217;re really sorry about our crappy network performance, but these femtocells will run you $50 one time, won&#8217;t count against your cellular minutes, and will drastically improve your home service since we&#8217;ve basically replaced your home phone anyway. Do you know how many people would buy one? Everyone. Every single person with a cellphone would get one of these things, and everyone would be a lot happier with their current service.</p>
<p>You can bet people will flee from AT&#038;T once the iPhone is available elsewhere. This is just another reason to leave. </p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/04/12/the-femtocell-situation/">The femtocell situation</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.gadgetteaser.com">Gadget Teaser</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.gadgetteaser.com/2010/04/12/the-femtocell-situation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: www.gadgetteaser.com @ 2026-06-18 18:19:27 by W3 Total Cache
-->