Category: Websites (Page 16 of 23)

Skype Stake Sold To Private Investor Group

Skype logo.The rumored Skype sale has been officially confirmed today, with eBay letting go of 65% of the company in a $2.75 billion valuation. The sale will net eBay $1.9 billion in cash on close, which should happen sometime within Q4 of this year.

I was actually shocked to see such a low price tag on Skype. eBay dropped $3.1 billion on the company back in 2005, but they lowered the price because they said certain synergies weren’t going to work out as planned. Still, Skype makes something like $600 million a year in revenue, so $2.75 billion looks cheap.

The first news of the sale came at the beginning of the year when eBay announced they were preparing Skype for an IPO in 2010. The move was obviously meant to court offers from investment groups, and Silver Lake Partners finally took the bait. There has been no word on whether the new investors will float Skype on the stock market as initially planned.

Hulu Has More Viewers Than Time Warner Cable

Silicon Alley Insider Hulu vs. Time Warner chart.According to Silicon Alley Insider, Hulu has passed the nation’s second largest cable provider, Time Warner Cable, in monthly viewership. The comScore report for July puts Hulu at 38 million viewers, while Time Warner was estimated to be closer to 34 million.

As the SAI article points out, there’s not a whole lot to draw from this news. Cable is still drawing far greater revenues than Hulu, so it’s hard to say how the two will compare into the future. There’s also the matter of the content actually being watched. While it’s probably rare that someone would fire up the DVR just to watch a clip of the Colbert Report, those clips are probably a large part of the viewer count for Hulu. Then again, those Hulu viewers may end up logging more video time because accessing content is a little more active than flipping on the TV. In any case, the comparison isn’t quite one to one.

Facebook Should Reconsider Friend Requests

Jesus wants to be your friend.I’m not secretive about the fact that I don’t like Facebook. I’ve mentioned in other posts that I don’t need daily updates from people I haven’t seen in years. The simple solution is to just not friend those folks, but some of them are incredibly persistent, sending requests four or five times before I cave.

Facebook posted a reminder on its blog this week to remind users that we have methods for dealing with these problems. If you don’t want to friend someone, press the ignore button. They’re never notified. You could also friend the person, let him read your profile, and then unfriend, in which case the person again won’t be notified. If you’re in my situation, though, you have just one recourse. You leave the friend request pending. In that way you never have to deal with the request again.

But I hate that solution. Hate it. I don’t like cluttered message systems, and there’s really no reason Facebook couldn’t implement a simple ignore system, as in, ignore this request and all future requests from this individual. It’s similar to blocking people, which the site allows you to do, just built into the friend request system, making it much easier to manage.

The fact that Facebook saw fit to remind users of these features suggests the site may be getting some negative feedback, and for good reason. Facebook beat MySpace by offering better privacy features, so why not this? Why must I subject myself to the hoard of messages people send to entire friend lists?

What’s Really Going On With Apple And Google Voice

GV Mobile for the iPhone.TechCrunch founder Michael Arrington has been one of the most prominent industry voices against Apple’s rejection of the Google Voice app. He was so miffed, in fact, that he gave up his iPhone for a myTouch 3G to be a part of initial GV Mobile testing. The FCC has since started to investigate the situation with regard to market competition and sent Apple backtracking. It’s become pretty clear over the past couple days that Apple acted alone in denying the app, and that no one, not even the FCC, is happy with their (Apple’s) decision.

Back to Arrington. He’s put together the best comprehensive analysis of the proceedings I’ve seen in the past few days. I’ve always kept an ear to the wall where Mr. Arrington decides to voice an opinion, and he has what might be some promising news for iPhone owners.

Here’s what you need to know. Several sources within Google confirmed to TechCrunch that it was indeed Apple who rejected the app – not AT&T and certainly not Google. Apple now denies ever rejecting the app, suggesting instead that it’s still under review because it could possibly take over for the iPhone’s native features, a claim that appears to be patently false.

The outcome? Arrington believes, for what seems to me good reason, that we’ll see the app pushed through in short order. Apple has been scrambling lately to revamp their approval process, making concessions for apps that have been previously denied. They’re also citing reasons for denial that are simply untrue or easily disproved. According to Arrington, that all points to approval. In his words:

Here’s what we believe Apple is preparing to do next. Their statement that they haven’t rejected the app, along with the long laundry list of complaints (none of which are true) tells us that they’re backtracking, and fast. Sometime soon, we guess, Apple will simply accept the Google Voice application. They have to – any serious investigation into the app by the FCC will show that the complaints around the app are unfounded and that it does none of the things Apple accuses it of doing. So Apple will save face by simply asking Google to ensure that the App doesn’t take over native phone, sms and other functions, and doesn’t sync the contacts to Google’s servers. Google will comply (they already have), and Apple will graciously accept the application.

That would certainly be a win for consumers, though it might be too late to win someone like Arrington back. He’s already fallen in love with Google Voice on Android. With such a ridiculous approval process and the fact that it took federal involvement to get the thing going, I can understand the angst. Unfortunately, I didn’t found TechCrunch, so no one asks me to help roll out the early iterations of what could be the best thing to happen to phones since the cell tower.

Airlines Miss The Message In Our Complaints No Matter How We Voice Them

Angry Tweets.A recent story on Reuters claims airlines may be struggling against a new foe in their never-ending PR war: Twitter. Where people were once making phone calls and composing strongly worded letters from the cramped discomfort of a landed airline seat, they’re now blowing off unmitigated steam on social sites like Twitter.

I opened the story because I thought it might have a nice spin on making Twitter useful. I know the service has its uses, but I find them to be few and far between for the average user. As it turns out, it’s not Twitter that seems to be doing the talking to the airlines, it’s things like Dave Carroll’s YouTube song, United Breaks Guitars. The song, which Carroll wrote after United broke a guitar and failed to take responsibility, went viral, and urged a quick response from the airline. United donated some money in Carroll’s name to a music foundation.

So Carroll makes music, United breaks Carroll’s instrument of choice, Carroll can’t make music without his instrument of choice, United donates money to help more people get better at making music – is this really the course of action we’re after? Seems to me United is trying to say, “Oh we didn’t break that guitar because we hate music. We love music. We want more people to make music.” But making music was never the issue. The issue was how some United worker mishandled Carroll’s luggage. So why is United donating to a music foundation? Why not employee dexterity training? What about emotional intelligence courses to increase worker empathy? Hell, why not just pay your handlers more for not breaking your customer’s belongings? I would take anything, anything but a donation to a god damn music foundation.

What we need to realize as a collective customer base is that United is more like the detached, loaded father who still thinks we were one big mistake than a company that knows its business. See, Dad knows what bitching sounds like, and when it happens he throws a pile of money at it. Bitch some more, get a car. Bitch some more, get a new watch. Bitch some more, get a credit card. What dad doesn’t understand are the words coming out of our mouths. He doesn’t know, or more appropriately, doesn’t care to know the real problem, so he addresses it however he sees fit, which is usually some non sequitur of epic proportions.

I realize I got a little off track there, but all of this is to say that none of our complaints, whether they’re through Twitter or on YouTube or Facebook or anything else, matter one bit if companies like United can’t figure out how to handle them. Christi Day, the woman behind the Facebook and Twitter profiles for Southwest airlines, wants you to know one thing: “The main thing that our customers need to know is that we hear them.” And it seems they do. They hear the noise we’re making, they just fail to understand the words.

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Gadget Teaser

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑